Reviews, tied to the job they were written for

The editor stays out of the way

Six months in, twelve thousand subscribers, paid tier live. Payouts have been on time every month. The referral program drove about a fifth of our growth.

Real multi-author support

Section-level subscriptions are the reason we moved. Three writers, three sections, one list. The CMS is basic but it does not need to be more.

Sensible defaults

Would recommend for a small team. Larger orgs will want the higher tier.

Held up as we grew

Not perfect, but every problem we have raised got an answer and most got fixed.

Sensible defaults

A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.

Replaced two tools with this

The API is clean and documented, which made our integration a one-day job.

Founder replies in public and it shows

Every issue I have raised got a public response with a timeline. Two were shipped. That is rarer than it should be.

Support is the differentiator

We use maybe sixty percent of it. That sixty percent works very well.

Better than what we left

A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.

Better than what we left

A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.

Held up as we grew

Stable and predictable. I have stopped thinking about it, which is the compliment.

Good, but import took longer than promised

Migrating twenty thousand subscribers took four days rather than the advertised one. Once in, everything has been smooth.

Solid, with a couple of rough edges

A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.

Replaced two tools with this

The core workflow is well thought through. Some of the settings are buried.

Good fit for a small team

Fast, and it stays fast as our volume grows. That is rarer than it should be.

Does the job without drama

Pricing is honest and the free tier was enough to prove it before we paid.

Held up as we grew

Pricing is honest and the free tier was enough to prove it before we paid.

Straightforward and fast

Solid day-to-day. We hit one limitation on reporting but support suggested a workable path.

Sensible defaults

Does what it says. The onboarding was better than I expected for the price.

Worth the switch

Not perfect, but every problem we have raised got an answer and most got fixed.

Better than what we left

It scaled with us from two seats to eleven without a repricing conversation.

Held up as we grew

Reliable. In four months we have had one short outage and it was communicated properly.

Sensible defaults

Would recommend for a small team. Larger orgs will want the higher tier.

Worth the switch

Fine for what we need. Not the most powerful option but the least annoying.