Emberly
UnclaimedEmail that grows with your list, not your bill.
BetterScore
Avg rating
4.4
45 reviews · 37 verified
Would recommend
91%
4★ and above
Resolution rate
33%
1 of 3 problems
Median first response
8h
67% of problems answered
Open problems
2
33 users affected
About
Emberly prices on sends rather than contacts, and pairs broadcast campaigns with lightweight automations for teams graduating from a free tool.
Use-case ranks
A product can rank very differently depending on the job it is being judged for.
Score breakdown
How the BetterScore of 83.7 in Email Marketing is composed.
Verified rating, recommendation rate, sentiment
Resolved rate, response speed, user confirmation
Verified users, depth, anomaly checks
Primary-use votes, workflow match
Helpful replies, Q&A, founder participation
Recent improvements, sentiment trend, release activity
Follows, saves, likes, qualified profile visits
Confidence: medium. Sponsored placements contribute zero points to this score.
Loved for, and complained about
Themes extracted from verified review pros and cons.
Loved for
- · Pricing model
- · Ease of use
- · Price
- · Integrations
- · Reporting
- · Support responsiveness
- · Reliability
- · Onboarding
Common complaints
- · Shallow automations
- · Price at the top tier
- · Advanced settings are buried
- · Limited integrations
- · Occasional slow support
- · Documentation
- · Reporting depth
- · Mobile experience
Problems
The public issue record. Open problems are as informative as resolved ones — so is how fast the company answered.
Open
2
Resolved
1
User-confirmed
0
Median resolution
13d
API responses omit rate-limit headers
There is no way to see remaining quota before being throttled, so clients can only back off after a 429.
Audit log omits deletions
Created and updated events are recorded but deletions are not, which leaves a gap in the trail during a compliance review.
Permissions do not apply to nested items
Restricting a parent container leaves items nested inside it readable by anyone with a direct link.
Reviews
37 of 45 reviews come from verified users.
4.4
45 reviews
Send-based pricing suits a dormant list
Half our list is seasonal. Paying per send rather than per contact cut our bill by about sixty percent. Automations are simple but adequate.
Loved
Pricing model
Complaints
Shallow automations
Support is the differentiator
Good value at our size. I would want more depth if we doubled the team.
Loved
Ease of use
Sensible defaults
A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.
Loved
Price
Complaints
Price at the top tier
Good fit for a small team
A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.
Loved
Price
Complaints
Price at the top tier