Emberly reviews

Send-based pricing suits a dormant list

Half our list is seasonal. Paying per send rather than per contact cut our bill by about sixty percent. Automations are simple but adequate.

Support is the differentiator

Good value at our size. I would want more depth if we doubled the team.

Sensible defaults

A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.

Good fit for a small team

A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.

Straightforward and fast

A few rough edges in the UI, but the underlying engine is dependable.

Replaced two tools with this

The core workflow is well thought through. Some of the settings are buried.

Worth the switch

Pricing is honest and the free tier was enough to prove it before we paid.

Better than what we left

Support answered within a few hours both times I needed them.

Sensible defaults

We evaluated four options and picked this one on support responsiveness. No regrets.

Does the job without drama

Would recommend for a small team. Larger orgs will want the higher tier.

Sensible defaults

Solid day-to-day. We hit one limitation on reporting but support suggested a workable path.

Replaced two tools with this

Took a couple of weeks to settle into it. Worth pushing through the first fortnight.

Worth the switch

The reporting finally gave our lead something to take into the monthly review.

Better than what we left

Fast, and it stays fast as our volume grows. That is rarer than it should be.

Straightforward and fast

It scaled with us from two seats to eleven without a repricing conversation.

Does the job without drama

Easy to hand over to a junior marketer, which was the deciding factor for us.

Fine, not flashy

We had one billing mix-up which was corrected the same week without argument.

Does the job without drama

Fast, and it stays fast as our volume grows. That is rarer than it should be.

Worth the switch

Pricing is honest and the free tier was enough to prove it before we paid.

Replaced two tools with this

We use maybe sixty percent of it. That sixty percent works very well.

Reliable day to day

Six months in and it still does the job. Nothing surprising, which is the point.

Better than what we left

The API is clean and documented, which made our integration a one-day job.

Worth the switch

Fast, and it stays fast as our volume grows. That is rarer than it should be.

Reliable day to day

Not perfect, but every problem we have raised got an answer and most got fixed.